Composition "My attitude to Chatsky": what to write about the main character
The composition "My Attitude to Chatsky" is included in thea list of mandatory, because it allows you to analyze the main character from different points of view. After all, his views on life are very different from the generally accepted ones, and bold ideas plunge Moscow society into astonishment. But, despite all the correctness of convictions, who is still Chatsky - the winner or the defeated?
A little about the main character
Before we begin to answer the question of whether,whether he succeeded in winning, in the composition "My Attitude Toward Chatsky" you need to tell about the personality and way of life of this character. The protagonist of the reader is already introduced to the conversation by other characters in the play. And then it becomes clear that Alexander Andreevich has a lover with whom they grew together, - Sophia.
But the girl does not wait for his return, sheeven embarrassing when the maid reminds her of the farewell scene during the departure of the young man. But nevertheless, she recognizes his dignity. Alexander Andreevich is intelligent, witty, sensitive and well educated.
The idea of his life can only be made up ofscraps of speech of other heroes. He began his career with Molchalin, she developed successfully, but he could not get used to the bureaucratic order. Also, the young man was a military man, but he also left this occupation. Despite the fact that in no place Chatsky did not stay long, this does not mean the light-mindedness of the young man. He did not stay in these arenas, because "to serve would be happy - it's sickening to serve."
Chatsky is a representative of the generation of innovators,who believed that society needs reforms in order to move forward. He did not accept the outdated ideas of Moscow society. Comparative characteristics of Chatsky one of the representatives of Famus society is best shown by his character.
Comparison of Alexander Andreevich and Molchalin
Why in the work "My Attitude in Chatsky"will it be appropriate to compare these two characters? Because the main theme of the play is the conflict between the "past century" and the "new century" that comes to replace it. And Chatsky and Molchalin are representatives of this conflict.
MOLCHALIN is a modest, unobtrusive younga man who never expressed his opinion. I considered that the main thing in life is to have a good job and rank, which can be obtained through sycophancy. MOLCHALIN hardly feels for Sophia the same feelings as she does towards him. He simply understands that if he becomes her husband, he will take a good position in society. And it was very important for Famusov and his acquaintances.
Chatsky, on the other hand, was not afraid to openly expressyour opinion and argue with others. He did not understand how the attitude towards a person could depend on the number of awards. For the young man, the main thing was the person, his convictions. Alexander Andreevich wanted to benefit society, but not by worshiping higher ranks, but by changing the outdated order and improving the life of the entire population of the country.
Chatsky and Sophia
But the complexity of the position of the protagonist is notis limited by the hostility of the FAMUS society. In the essay "My Attitude to Chatsky" you can write briefly about the fact that his only support was his love for Sophia. He did not give up the hope that the girl would become his wife.
He refused to believe until the last that sheMolchalin preferred him. When Chatsky becomes aware that Sophia has let out a rumor about his madness, the last thing that kept him in Moscow was lost. After all, for his sake, he returned back, keeping in his heart the image that he took with him. And the destruction of this illusion helps Chatsky decide to leave.
Opposing the society of Famusov
In the work "My Attitude to Chatsky" one of thethe key moments will be the relationship between the hero and the FAMUS society. In this conflict, not just a clash of personalities is a reflection of that mood in a society that reigned during the writer's time. This is the time for the upcoming reforms that were to take place in society.
Through the play is shown the struggle of the Moscow nobles,landlords who did not want to change anything with people who looked wider than they, and understood that changes are needed by society. After all, it is this bureaucracy, corruption is the anchor for a developed society. This is a call to the fact that you do not need to evaluate people according to their social status and rank, but you need to pay attention to the person.
"The Millions of Tortures" by Chatsky
What is the tragedy of the main characterplays? Only in the refusal of Sophia? Or is the society hostile to him? The very title of the play tells the reader that Chatsky's problem lies in realizing the futility of his attempts to change Famusov and his entourage.
It seems to him that he can not do anything alone. And so the main character decides to leave. It is difficult to give an unambiguous answer to the question whether Chatsky is a winner or a defeated one. Because it seems that he did nothing - the society remains the same. But in fact Chatsky made them afraid and was able to show them that changes are inevitable, that the "age to come" will replace the "century past." And then other people will prove to them (and maybe Chatsky himself and his comrades) that the ideas of the protagonist were correct, that he is the winner.